29.10.2008
  • Here are the first pictures of the all new Nissan 370Z.

Click here! 

Full details of the car will be released on 19th November, but the pictures suggest that it’s considerably more compact then the 350Z and it has a real aggression about it – although interestingly they’ve resisted the temptation to draw design details from the phenomenal GT-R.

View more pictures and read the FULL ARTICLE

Then let us know your thoughts..

About Steve Davies

Steve Davies
Steve is a media, venture, and technology advisor and a former Partner at KPMG Consulting, PriceWaterhouse Coopers and Managing Partner at EIM - his clients range from global web and media companies to small start-ups. He formed Drivers Republic (DR) in 2007, the UK's first digital automotive magazine, with a team of EVO and Autocar writers before creating SkiddMark, and also writes as a guest contributor on Unruly Media’s Meme Machine blog and for Econsultancy’s digital marketing blog.

Tell us what you think..

When you post a comment, it will also appear in your News Feed on Facebook (if you so choose), enabling you to take the conversation to where your friends already are. Thereafter you can continue discussing on Facebook and the conversations between SkiddMark and Facebook will be auto-magically synched, regardless of where the comment was made.

18 Comments

  1. Mark Williams
    October 29, 2008

    Actually had a proper look at one of these a few years back. Quality of the interior was appalling and the single strut rather than a gas-brace for the bonnet smacked of cost saving too.

    Then we fired it up and went for a 10 mins spin and I forgot all about the quality niggles. Just wasn’t practical enough in the end but for the money yes was very tempting.

    Easy to see why they sold so many.

    Reply
  2. Mark Williams
    October 29, 2008

    Actually had a proper look at one of these a few years back. Quality of the interior was appalling and the single strut rather than a gas-brace for the bonnet smacked of cost saving too.

    Then we fired it up and went for a 10 mins spin and I forgot all about the quality niggles. Just wasn’t practical enough in the end but for the money yes was very tempting.

    Easy to see why they sold so many.

    Reply
  3. Daytonafan
    October 29, 2008

    First impressions like this more than the 350Z.

    Reply
  4. Daytonafan
    October 29, 2008

    First impressions like this more than the 350Z.

    Reply
  5. Mark Williams
    October 29, 2008

    Agreed.

    Reply
  6. Mark Williams
    October 29, 2008

    Agreed.

    Reply
  7. Dave Knott
    October 30, 2008

    I must say, I’m disappointed at the design. The 350Z design is much more cohesive as a whole. Admittedly, the 350 does have a bit of a lardy arse, but proportions on the 350Z are generally very good – especially in side profile.

    This though, has weird “slashed” head and tail lights that look contrived, and the rear window line looks at odds with the bloated rear haunches.

    The improved interior quality will be very welcome (and desperately needed), but unless they radically reduce the car’s weight, I fail to see how a shorter wheelbase is going to transform the car. The 350Z benefits from quite a long wheelbase – which helps controlability while sliding. Drifting has always been a 350Z forte – let’s hope this 370Z still slides as well as the 350…..

    Reply
  8. Dave Knott
    October 30, 2008

    I must say, I’m disappointed at the design. The 350Z design is much more cohesive as a whole. Admittedly, the 350 does have a bit of a lardy arse, but proportions on the 350Z are generally very good – especially in side profile.

    This though, has weird “slashed” head and tail lights that look contrived, and the rear window line looks at odds with the bloated rear haunches.

    The improved interior quality will be very welcome (and desperately needed), but unless they radically reduce the car’s weight, I fail to see how a shorter wheelbase is going to transform the car. The 350Z benefits from quite a long wheelbase – which helps controlability while sliding. Drifting has always been a 350Z forte – let’s hope this 370Z still slides as well as the 350…..

    Reply
  9. Steve Davies
    Steve
    October 30, 2008

    From what I hear Nissan have concentrated on making the 370Z lighter. It is slightly shorter, wider and more powerful than the 350Z and Nissan are gunning for Porsche’s Cayman (revised version to be launched next Feb).

    So just like the GT-R being compared with Porsche’s 911 Turbo, it looks like Nissan have similarly high ambitions for their new Z.

    I for one look forward to finding out how they’ve done, which I am sure will keep us debating the whole ‘upstart-Nissan taking on Porsche’ issue all through those quiet winter months.

    Reply
  10. Steve Davies
    Steve
    October 30, 2008

    From what I hear Nissan have concentrated on making the 370Z lighter. It is slightly shorter, wider and more powerful than the 350Z and Nissan are gunning for Porsche’s Cayman (revised version to be launched next Feb).

    So just like the GT-R being compared with Porsche’s 911 Turbo, it looks like Nissan have similarly high ambitions for their new Z.

    I for one look forward to finding out how they’ve done, which I am sure will keep us debating the whole ‘upstart-Nissan taking on Porsche’ issue all through those quiet winter months.

    Reply
  11. Kermit79
    October 30, 2008

    I will reserve judgement on the design until I see one in the metal. I think the most interesting thing on this will be if the price stays around the same mark, or whether Nissan decides that the Cayman challenger can move a little closer in price to the Porsche…which I think will be a mistake. Either way it is better looking than the Cayman, which I think looks like a frog perched on a lilypad from the arse-end.

    Reply
  12. Kermit79
    October 30, 2008

    I will reserve judgement on the design until I see one in the metal. I think the most interesting thing on this will be if the price stays around the same mark, or whether Nissan decides that the Cayman challenger can move a little closer in price to the Porsche…which I think will be a mistake. Either way it is better looking than the Cayman, which I think looks like a frog perched on a lilypad from the arse-end.

    Reply
  13. codesurge
    October 30, 2008

    While they haven’t drawn design cues from the R35 GT-R, what they have done is to incorporate elements from the Z-cars of the past. The shortened rump and side window profile seem to have been migrated over from the 240Z.

    Reply
  14. codesurge
    October 30, 2008

    While they haven’t drawn design cues from the R35 GT-R, what they have done is to incorporate elements from the Z-cars of the past. The shortened rump and side window profile seem to have been migrated over from the 240Z.

    Reply
  15. Pedro Sousa
    October 30, 2008

    I rekon it looks great! Much closer to the original 240z.

    They should price it like GT-R vs 911 turbo: Half the price of a Cayman!!! That should do it 8-)

    Reply
  16. Pedro Sousa
    October 30, 2008

    I rekon it looks great! Much closer to the original 240z.

    They should price it like GT-R vs 911 turbo: Half the price of a Cayman!!! That should do it 8-)

    Reply
  17. Mark McTavish
    November 2, 2008

    Smaller and lighter…both positives. I’m not sure I see the reason for increasing the engines displacement?

    Surely staying with the same (or smaller) displacement and employing some new technology (direct injection?) would allow them to increase performance whilst also improving emissions/fuel consumption etc.

    More performance doesn’t need increased displacement…

    Looks quite nice, certainly growing on me since I first viewed it a couple of days ago. The rear arches make the body work appear as if it has been stretched over the drive train…which is always a good look on a car of this nature.

    Reply
  18. Mark McTavish
    November 2, 2008

    Smaller and lighter…both positives. I’m not sure I see the reason for increasing the engines displacement?

    Surely staying with the same (or smaller) displacement and employing some new technology (direct injection?) would allow them to increase performance whilst also improving emissions/fuel consumption etc.

    More performance doesn’t need increased displacement…

    Looks quite nice, certainly growing on me since I first viewed it a couple of days ago. The rear arches make the body work appear as if it has been stretched over the drive train…which is always a good look on a car of this nature.

    Reply

Our Story

Starting with Drivers Republic in 2007, followed by SkiddMark two years later, our goal has always been to support content makers and automotive brands as they transform towards an all-digital future. We do this through enabling aspiring writers, curating great content and disrupting conventional brand marketing to filter out the noise and encourage investment in areas that will benefit those who are passionate about driving.

  • Rackspace is a trademark of Rackspace US, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Company
Get More SkiddMark
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: